Oral, Vaginal, and Stool Microbial Signatures in Patients With Endometriosis as Potential Diagnostic Non-Invasive Biomarkers: A Prospective Cohort Study/Experiment 2

From BugSigDB


Needs review

Curated date: 2024/11/08

Curator: Aleru Divine

Revision editor(s): Aleru Divine

Subjects

Location of subjects
Australia
Host species Species from which microbiome was sampled. Contact us to have more species added.
Homo sapiens
Body site Anatomical site where microbial samples were extracted from according to the Uber Anatomy Ontology
Mouth Adult mouth,Cavital oralis,Cavitas oris,Cavum oris,Mouth cavity,Oral region,Oral vestibule,Regio oralis,Rima oris,Stoma,Stomatodaeum,Trophic apparatus,Vestibule of mouth,Vestibulum oris,Mouth,mouth
Condition The experimental condition / phenotype studied according to the Experimental Factor Ontology
Endometriosis endometriosis,Endometriosis (clinical),endometriosis (disease),Endometriosis (disorder),Endometriosis (morphologic abnormality),ENDOMETRIOSIS NEC,Endometriosis NOS,Endometriosis NOS (disorder),Endometriosis of other specified sites,Endometriosis, site unspecified,Endometriosis
Group 0 name Corresponds to the control (unexposed) group for case-control studies
Healthy control and Non-endometriosis cohorts
Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
Endometriosis cohort
Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
Participants in the endometriosis cohort were women who were confirmed to have endometriosis.
Group 0 sample size Number of subjects in the control (unexposed) group
43
Group 1 sample size Number of subjects in the case (exposed) group
21

Lab analysis

Sequencing type
16S
16S variable region One or more hypervariable region(s) of the bacterial 16S gene
V3-V4
Sequencing platform Manufacturer and experimental platform used for quantifying microbial abundance
Illumina

Statistical Analysis

Data transformation Data transformation applied to microbial abundance measurements prior to differential abundance testing (if any).
relative abundances
Statistical test
LEfSe
Significance threshold p-value or FDR threshold used for differential abundance testing (if any)
0.05
MHT correction Have statistical tests be corrected for multiple hypothesis testing (MHT)?
No
LDA Score above Threshold for the linear discriminant analysis (LDA) score for studies using the popular LEfSe tool
2.0
Matched on Factors on which subjects have been matched on in a case-control study
age, sex


Signature 1

Needs review

Curated date: 2024/11/08

Curator: Aleru Divine

Revision editor(s): Aleru Divine

Source: Figure 5

Description: Microbial features that were detected to be differentially abundant between the three cohorts using LEfSe analysis

Abundance in Group 1: increased abundance in Endometriosis cohort

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Veillonella
bacterium F16
Actinomycetaceae

Revision editor(s): Aleru Divine