The vaginal microbiome is associated with endometrial cancer grade and histology/Experiment 2

From BugSigDB


Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Svetlana up on 2025-1-10

Curated date: 2024/12/25

Curator: KateRasheed

Revision editor(s): KateRasheed

Subjects

Location of subjects
United States of America
Host species Species from which microbiome was sampled. Contact us to have more species added.
Homo sapiens
Body site Anatomical site where microbial samples were extracted from according to the Uber Anatomy Ontology
Vagina Vagina,vagina,Distal oviductal region,Distal portion of oviduct,Vaginae
Condition The experimental condition / phenotype studied according to the Experimental Factor Ontology
Endometrial cancer cancer of endometrium,endometrial Ca,endometrial cancer,endometrial neoplasm,endometrium cancer,malignant endometrial neoplasm,malignant endometrium neoplasm,malignant neoplasm of endometrium,neoplasm of endometrium,primary malignant neoplasm of endometrium,tumor of endometrium,Endometrial cancer
Group 0 name Corresponds to the control (unexposed) group for case-control studies
Benign
Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
High Grade
Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
High Grade refers to patients with high grade endometrial cancer
Group 0 sample size Number of subjects in the control (unexposed) group
11
Group 1 sample size Number of subjects in the case (exposed) group
20
Antibiotics exclusion Number of days without antibiotics usage (if applicable) and other antibiotics-related criteria used to exclude participants (if any)
14 days

Lab analysis

Sequencing type
WMS
16S variable region One or more hypervariable region(s) of the bacterial 16S gene
Not specified
Sequencing platform Manufacturer and experimental platform used for quantifying microbial abundance
BGISEQ-500 Sequencing

Statistical Analysis

Data transformation Data transformation applied to microbial abundance measurements prior to differential abundance testing (if any).
raw counts
Statistical test
DESeq2
Significance threshold p-value or FDR threshold used for differential abundance testing (if any)
0.05
MHT correction Have statistical tests be corrected for multiple hypothesis testing (MHT)?
Yes

Alpha Diversity

Shannon Estimator of species richness and species evenness: more weight on species richness
increased
Richness Number of species
increased

Signature 1

Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Svetlana up on 2025-1-10

Curated date: 2024/12/25

Curator: KateRasheed

Revision editor(s): KateRasheed

Source: Fig. 3B

Description: Differential abundance of taxa between High grade and Benign patients

Abundance in Group 1: increased abundance in High Grade

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Fusobacterium ulcerans

Revision editor(s): KateRasheed

Signature 2

Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Svetlana up on 2025-1-10

Curated date: 2024/12/25

Curator: KateRasheed

Revision editor(s): KateRasheed

Source: Fig. 3B

Description: Differential abundance of taxa between High grade and Benign patients

Abundance in Group 1: decreased abundance in High Grade

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Ureaplasma parvum
Ureaplasma urealyticum
Streptococcus mitis
Streptococcus agalactiae
Staphylococcus epidermidis
Prevotella amnii
Lactobacillus jensenii
Sneathia vaginalis
Lactobacillus gasseri
Lactobacillus crispatus
Bifidobacterium longum
Bifidobacterium breve
Fannyhessea vaginae
Anaerococcus tetradius
Winkia neuii
Actinobaculum massiliense

Revision editor(s): KateRasheed