The vaginal microbiome is associated with endometrial cancer grade and histology/Experiment 5

From BugSigDB


Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Svetlana up on 2025-1-10

Curated date: 2024/12/26

Curator: KateRasheed

Revision editor(s): KateRasheed

Subjects

Location of subjects
United States of America
Host species Species from which microbiome was sampled. Contact us to have more species added.
Homo sapiens
Body site Anatomical site where microbial samples were extracted from according to the Uber Anatomy Ontology
Vagina Vagina,vagina,Distal oviductal region,Distal portion of oviduct,Vaginae
Condition The experimental condition / phenotype studied according to the Experimental Factor Ontology
Endometrial cancer cancer of endometrium,endometrial Ca,endometrial cancer,endometrial neoplasm,endometrium cancer,malignant endometrial neoplasm,malignant endometrium neoplasm,malignant neoplasm of endometrium,neoplasm of endometrium,primary malignant neoplasm of endometrium,tumor of endometrium,Endometrial cancer
Group 0 name Corresponds to the control (unexposed) group for case-control studies
Benign
Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
Serous
Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
Serous histology is a term used to describe the histology of tumors, carcinomas, and other tissues that are associated with serum, the clear liquid part of blood.
Group 0 sample size Number of subjects in the control (unexposed) group
11
Antibiotics exclusion Number of days without antibiotics usage (if applicable) and other antibiotics-related criteria used to exclude participants (if any)
14 days

Lab analysis

Sequencing type
WMS
16S variable region One or more hypervariable region(s) of the bacterial 16S gene
Not specified
Sequencing platform Manufacturer and experimental platform used for quantifying microbial abundance
BGISEQ-500 Sequencing

Statistical Analysis

Data transformation Data transformation applied to microbial abundance measurements prior to differential abundance testing (if any).
raw counts
Statistical test
DESeq2
Significance threshold p-value or FDR threshold used for differential abundance testing (if any)
0.05
MHT correction Have statistical tests be corrected for multiple hypothesis testing (MHT)?
Yes


Signature 1

Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Svetlana up on 2025-1-10

Curated date: 2024/12/26

Curator: KateRasheed

Revision editor(s): KateRasheed

Source: Supplementary Figure 5A

Description: Differential abundance of taxa between Benign and Serous

Abundance in Group 1: increased abundance in Serous

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Fusobacterium ulcerans

Revision editor(s): KateRasheed

Signature 2

Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Svetlana up on 2025-1-10

Curated date: 2024/12/26

Curator: KateRasheed

Revision editor(s): KateRasheed

Source: Supplementary Figure 5A

Description: Differential abundance of taxa between Benign and Serous

Abundance in Group 1: decreased abundance in Serous

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Ureaplasma urealyticum
Tannerella forsythia
Streptococcus mitis
Streptococcus vestibularis
Staphylococcus aureus
Staphylococcus epidermidis
Prevotella denticola
Segatella oulorum
Prevotella amnii
Hallella bergensis
Prevotella sp.
Peptoniphilus lacrimalis
Mobiluncus mulieris
Mobiluncus curtisii
Leptotrichia hofstadii
Limosilactobacillus oris
Lactobacillus iners
Lactobacillus gasseri
Limosilactobacillus fermentum
Filifactor alocis
Facklamia hominis
Enterococcus faecalis
Dorea formicigenerans
Campylobacter hominis
Bifidobacterium longum
Bifidobacterium breve
Arcanobacterium sp.
Anaerococcus tetradius
Aerococcus urinae
Schaalia turicensis
Winkia neuii
Actinomyces graevenitzii
Gleimia europaea
Actinotignum schaalii

Revision editor(s): KateRasheed