Microbiome Responses to an Uncontrolled Short-Term Diet Intervention in the Frame of the Citizen Science Project/Experiment 1

From BugSigDB


Needs review

Curated date: 2021/01/10

Curator: WikiWorks

Revision editor(s): WikiWorks, Victoria

Subjects

Location of subjects
Russian Federation
Host species Species from which microbiome was sampled. Contact us to have more species added.
Homo sapiens
Body site Anatomical site where microbial samples were extracted from according to the Uber Anatomy Ontology
Feces Cow dung,Cow pat,Droppings,Dung,Excrement,Excreta,Faeces,Fecal material,Fecal matter,Fewmet,Frass,Guano,Matières fécales@fr,Merde@fr,Ordure,Partie de la merde@fr,Piece of shit,Porción de mierda@es,Portion of dung,Portion of excrement,Portion of faeces,Portion of fecal material,Portion of fecal matter,Portion of feces,Portion of guano,Portion of scat,Portionem cacas,Scat,Spoor,Spraint,Stool,Teil der fäkalien@de,Feces,feces
Condition The experimental condition / phenotype studied according to the Experimental Factor Ontology
Diet Dietary,Diets,Diet,diet
Group 0 name Corresponds to the control (unexposed) group for case-control studies
high vegetable, fruit, grain
Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
Low vegetable, fruit, grains,
Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
low fiber
Group 0 sample size Number of subjects in the control (unexposed) group
215
Group 1 sample size Number of subjects in the case (exposed) group
215

Lab analysis

Sequencing type
16S
16S variable region One or more hypervariable region(s) of the bacterial 16S gene
V4
Sequencing platform Manufacturer and experimental platform used for quantifying microbial abundance
Illumina

Statistical Analysis

Data transformation Data transformation applied to microbial abundance measurements prior to differential abundance testing (if any).
relative abundances
Statistical test
LEfSe
Significance threshold p-value or FDR threshold used for differential abundance testing (if any)
0.05
MHT correction Have statistical tests be corrected for multiple hypothesis testing (MHT)?
Yes
LDA Score above Threshold for the linear discriminant analysis (LDA) score for studies using the popular LEfSe tool
2


Signature 1

Needs review

Curated date: 2021/01/10

Curator: Lora Kasselman

Revision editor(s): WikiWorks

Source: Figure 1 and Figure 2

Description: Figure 1. Associations of the microbial taxa with long-term dietary habits and other factors from the questionnaire (n = 207 subjects). Analysis was performed for the baseline samples at taxonomic levels from species to phyla. Rows are sorted in alphabetic order. Cell color denotes the value of the linear model coefficient from the MaAsLin analysis. All significant associations (FDR adjusted p < 0.1) are marked with one of the symbols (&, #, @): “&”. Figure 2. Major changes in the gut community structure of the volunteers after following the dietary recommendations. Red branches of the cladogram denote the taxa that were increased in abundance, while the blue ones—decreased. Significance criterion: p < 0.05 in metagenomeSeq model and log10 of the effect size >2 in LEfSe method (n = 430 paired samples).

Abundance in Group 1: increased abundance in Low vegetable, fruit, grains,

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Bacteroidaceae
Porphyromonadaceae
Prevotellaceae
Rikenellaceae
Oscillospiraceae
Acidaminococcaceae
Veillonellaceae
Sutterellaceae
Desulfovibrionaceae
Lactobacillaceae

Revision editor(s): WikiWorks

Signature 2

Needs review

Curated date: 2021/01/10

Curator: Lora Kasselman

Revision editor(s): WikiWorks

Source: Figure 1 and Figure 2

Description: Figure 1. Associations of the microbial taxa with long-term dietary habits and other factors from the questionnaire (n = 207 subjects). Analysis was performed for the baseline samples at taxonomic levels from species to phyla. Rows are sorted in alphabetic order. Cell color denotes the value of the linear model coefficient from the MaAsLin analysis. All significant associations (FDR adjusted p < 0.1) are marked with one of the symbols (&, #, @): “&”. Figure 2. Major changes in the gut community structure of the volunteers after following the dietary recommendations. Red branches of the cladogram denote the taxa that were increased in abundance, while the blue ones—decreased. Significance criterion: p < 0.05 in metagenomeSeq model and log10 of the effect size >2 in LEfSe method (n = 430 paired samples).

Abundance in Group 1: decreased abundance in Low vegetable, fruit, grains,

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Clostridium
Eubacterium
Lachnospiraceae
Oscillibacter
Methanobacteriaceae
Bifidobacteriaceae
Coriobacteriaceae
Staphylococcaceae
Enterococcaceae
Streptococcaceae
Christensenellaceae
Clostridiaceae
Erysipelotrichaceae
Bacillota
Sphingomonadaceae
Enterobacteriaceae
Verrucomicrobiaceae

Revision editor(s): WikiWorks