Composition and metabolism of fecal microbiota from normal and overweight children are differentially affected by melibiose, raffinose and raffinose-derived fructans
-
Quality control
- Retracted paper
- Contamination issues suspected
- Batch effect issues suspected
- Uncontrolled confounding suspected
- Results are suspect (various reasons)
- Tags applied
Experiment 1
Subjects
- Location of subjects
- Estonia
- Host species Species from which microbiome was sampled. Contact us to have more species added.
- Homo sapiens
- Body site Anatomical site where microbial samples were extracted from according to the Uber Anatomy Ontology
- Feces Cow dung,Cow pat,Droppings,Dung,Excrement,Excreta,Faeces,Fecal material,Fecal matter,Fewmet,Frass,Guano,Matières fécales@fr,Merde@fr,Ordure,Partie de la merde@fr,Piece of shit,Porción de mierda@es,Portion of dung,Portion of excrement,Portion of faeces,Portion of fecal material,Portion of fecal matter,Portion of feces,Portion of guano,Portion of scat,Portionem cacas,Scat,Spoor,Spraint,Stool,Teil der fäkalien@de,Feces,feces
- Condition The experimental condition / phenotype studied according to the Experimental Factor Ontology
- Obesity Adiposis,Adiposity,Obese,Obese (finding),obesity,Obesity (disorder),Obesity [Ambiguous],obesity disease,obesity disorder,Obesity NOS,Obesity, unspecified,Overweight and obesity,Obesity
- Group 0 name Corresponds to the control (unexposed) group for case-control studies
- normal weight children
- Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
- overweight children
- Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
- overweight, but otherwise healthy children (7-12 years)
- Group 0 sample size Number of subjects in the control (unexposed) group
- 9
- Group 1 sample size Number of subjects in the case (exposed) group
- 9
Lab analysis
- Sequencing type
- 16S
- 16S variable region One or more hypervariable region(s) of the bacterial 16S gene
- V3-V4
- Sequencing platform Manufacturer and experimental platform used for quantifying microbial abundance
- Illumina
Statistical Analysis
- Data transformation Data transformation applied to microbial abundance measurements prior to differential abundance testing (if any).
- relative abundances
- Statistical test
- T-Test
- Significance threshold p-value or FDR threshold used for differential abundance testing (if any)
- 0.05
- MHT correction Have statistical tests be corrected for multiple hypothesis testing (MHT)?
- No
Signature 1
Curated date: 2021/01/10
Curator: Mst Afroza Parvin
Source: Figure 3, Table S2, text
Description: Composition of fecal pools used as inocula according to dominant taxa classified at the phylum or species level.
Abundance in Group 1: increased abundance in overweight children
NCBI | Quality Control | Links |
---|---|---|
Agathobacter rectalis | ||
Bifidobacterium bifidum | ||
unclassified Coprococcus | ||
Streptococcus equinus | ||
Eshraghiella crossota | ||
Peptoniphilus timonensis |
Signature 2
Curated date: 2021/01/10
Curator: Mst Afroza Parvin
Revision editor(s): WikiWorks, Folakunmi, Scholastica, Welile
Source: Figure 3, Table S2
Description: Composition of fecal pools used as inocula according to dominant taxa classified at the phylum or species level.
Abundance in Group 1: decreased abundance in overweight children
Revision editor(s): WikiWorks, Folakunmi, Scholastica, Welile
Experiment 2
Subjects
- Group 0 name Corresponds to the control (unexposed) group for case-control studies
- Adults
- Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
- Overweight children
- Group 1 sample size Number of subjects in the case (exposed) group
- 7
Lab analysis
Statistical Analysis
Signature 1
Source: Figure 3, Table S2
Description: Composition of fecal pools used as inocula according to dominant taxa classified at the phylum or species level.
Abundance in Group 1: increased abundance in Overweight children
Signature 2
Source: Figure 3, Table S2
Description: Composition of fecal pools used as inocula according to dominant taxa classified at the phylum or species level.
Abundance in Group 1: decreased abundance in Overweight children
NCBI | Quality Control | Links |
---|---|---|
Senegalimassilia anaerobia | ||
Coprococcus eutactus | ||
Segatella copri | ||
Ruminococcus callidus | ||
Eubacterium ventriosum | ||
unclassified Lachnospira | ||
unclassified Christensenellaceae |
Experiment 3
Subjects
- Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
- normal weight children
- Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
- healthy children with normal weight (7-12 years)
- Group 0 sample size Number of subjects in the control (unexposed) group
- 7
- Group 1 sample size Number of subjects in the case (exposed) group
- 9
Lab analysis
Statistical Analysis
Signature 1
Source: Figure 3, Table S2
Description: Composition of fecal pools used as inocula according to dominant taxa classified at the species level.
Abundance in Group 1: increased abundance in normal weight children
Revision editor(s): Folakunmi, Joan Chuks
Signature 2
Source: Figure 3, Table S2
Description: Composition of fecal pools used as inocula according to dominant taxa classified at the species level.
Abundance in Group 1: decreased abundance in normal weight children
NCBI | Quality Control | Links |
---|---|---|
Roseburia intestinalis | ||
Ruminococcus callidus | ||
unclassified Alloprevotella | ||
uncultured Erysipelotrichaceae bacterium |
Revision editor(s): Folakunmi, Joan Chuks