The conjunctival microbiome in health and trachomatous disease: a case control study/Experiment 4

From BugSigDB


Needs review

Curated date: 2023/07/20

Curator: Andre

Revision editor(s): Andre, Folakunmi, Peace Sandy

Subjects

Location of subjects
Gambia
Host species Species from which microbiome was sampled. Contact us to have more species added.
Homo sapiens
Body site Anatomical site where microbial samples were extracted from according to the Uber Anatomy Ontology
Conjunctiva Conjunctiva,conjunctiva,Conjunctivae,Conjunctivas,Tunica conjunctiva,Wall of conjunctival sac
Condition The experimental condition / phenotype studied according to the Experimental Factor Ontology
Chlamydia trachomatis Chlamydozoon trachomatis,Rickettsia trachomae,Rickettsia trachomatis,Chlamydia trachomatis,chlamydia trachomatis
Group 0 name Corresponds to the control (unexposed) group for case-control studies
Cases aged > 10 years with clinical signs of conjunctival scarring sampled during the dry season
Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
Cases aged = 10 years with clinical signs of conjunctival scarring sampled during the dry season
Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
Participants aged 10 years with clinical signs of conjunctival scarring in dry season
Group 0 sample size Number of subjects in the control (unexposed) group
63
Group 1 sample size Number of subjects in the case (exposed) group
63
Antibiotics exclusion Number of days without antibiotics usage (if applicable) and other antibiotics-related criteria used to exclude participants (if any)
Not mentioned

Lab analysis

Sequencing type
16S
16S variable region One or more hypervariable region(s) of the bacterial 16S gene
V1-V3
Sequencing platform Manufacturer and experimental platform used for quantifying microbial abundance
Roche454

Statistical Analysis

Statistical test
Metastats
Significance threshold p-value or FDR threshold used for differential abundance testing (if any)
0.05
MHT correction Have statistical tests be corrected for multiple hypothesis testing (MHT)?
Yes
Matched on Factors on which subjects have been matched on in a case-control study
age, ethnic group, geographic area, sex

Alpha Diversity

Shannon Estimator of species richness and species evenness: more weight on species richness
unchanged
Richness Number of species
unchanged

Signature 1

Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Peace Sandy on 2024-2-16

Curated date: 2023/07/20

Curator: Andre

Revision editor(s): Andre, Folakunmi, Peace Sandy

Source: Table 2

Description: Changes in taxa abundance between groups

Abundance in Group 1: increased abundance in Cases aged = 10 years with clinical signs of conjunctival scarring sampled during the dry season

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Globicatella

Revision editor(s): Andre, Folakunmi, Peace Sandy

Signature 2

Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Peace Sandy on 2024-2-16

Curated date: 2023/07/20

Curator: Andre

Revision editor(s): Andre, Folakunmi, Peace Sandy

Source: Table 2

Description: Changes in taxa abundance between groups

Abundance in Group 1: decreased abundance in Cases aged = 10 years with clinical signs of conjunctival scarring sampled during the dry season

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Corynebacterium
Streptococcus

Revision editor(s): Andre, Folakunmi, Peace Sandy