Intestinal microbiota influences clinical outcome and side effects of early breast cancer treatment/Experiment 11

From BugSigDB


Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Svetlana up on 2024-7-23

Curated date: 2024/04/23

Curator: Scholastica

Revision editor(s): Scholastica

Subjects

Location of subjects
France
Host species Species from which microbiome was sampled. Contact us to have more species added.
Homo sapiens
Body site Anatomical site where microbial samples were extracted from according to the Uber Anatomy Ontology
Feces Cow dung,Cow pat,Droppings,Dung,Excrement,Excreta,Faeces,Fecal material,Fecal matter,Fewmet,Frass,Guano,Matières fécales@fr,Merde@fr,Ordure,Partie de la merde@fr,Piece of shit,Porción de mierda@es,Portion of dung,Portion of excrement,Portion of faeces,Portion of fecal material,Portion of fecal matter,Portion of feces,Portion of guano,Portion of scat,Portionem cacas,Scat,Spoor,Spraint,Stool,Teil der fäkalien@de,Feces,feces
Condition The experimental condition / phenotype studied according to the Experimental Factor Ontology
Response to combination chemotherapy Response to combination chemotherapy,response to combination chemotherapy
Group 0 name Corresponds to the control (unexposed) group for case-control studies
Pre-Chemotherapy
Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
Post-Chemotherapy
Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
Breast cancer patients after Chemotherapy
Group 0 sample size Number of subjects in the control (unexposed) group
45
Group 1 sample size Number of subjects in the case (exposed) group
45
Antibiotics exclusion Number of days without antibiotics usage (if applicable) and other antibiotics-related criteria used to exclude participants (if any)
None

Lab analysis

Sequencing type
WMS
16S variable region One or more hypervariable region(s) of the bacterial 16S gene
Not specified
Sequencing platform Manufacturer and experimental platform used for quantifying microbial abundance
Ion Torrent

Statistical Analysis

Data transformation Data transformation applied to microbial abundance measurements prior to differential abundance testing (if any).
relative abundances
Statistical test
PLS-DA (Partial least square discriminant analysis)
Significance threshold p-value or FDR threshold used for differential abundance testing (if any)
0.05
MHT correction Have statistical tests be corrected for multiple hypothesis testing (MHT)?
Yes

Alpha Diversity

Richness Number of species
increased

Signature 1

Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Svetlana up on 2024-7-23

Curated date: 2024/04/23

Curator: Scholastica

Revision editor(s): Scholastica

Source: Fig. 3C

Description: Differentially significant abundant taxa in breast cancer patients pre-Chemotherapy compared to post-Chemotherapy

Abundance in Group 1: increased abundance in Post-Chemotherapy

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Holdemanella biformis
[Ruminococcus] torques
Dorea formicigenerans
Firmicutes bacterium CAG:110
Methanobrevibacter smithii

Revision editor(s): Scholastica

Signature 2

Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Svetlana up on 2024-7-23

Curated date: 2024/04/23

Curator: Scholastica

Revision editor(s): Scholastica

Source: Fig. 3C

Description: Differentially significant abundant taxa in breast cancer patients pre-Chemotherapy compared to post-Chemotherapy

Abundance in Group 1: decreased abundance in Post-Chemotherapy

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Eggerthella lenta
Coprobacter fastidiosus
Veillonella atypica
Eisenbergiella tayi
Bacteroides uniformis
Enterocloster asparagiformis
Veillonella parvula
Phocaeicola vulgatus
Eubacterium sp. OM08-24
Roseburia intestinalis
Anaerotignum lactatifermentans
Gordonibacter pamelaeae
Anaerotruncus colihominis

Revision editor(s): Scholastica