Unveiling the microbiome during post-partum uterine infection: a deep shotgun sequencing approach to characterize the dairy cow uterine microbiome/Experiment 6

From BugSigDB


Needs review

Curated date: 2025/02/24

Curator: MyleeeA

Revision editor(s): MyleeeA

Subjects

Location of subjects
United States of America
Host species Species from which microbiome was sampled. Contact us to have more species added.
Bos taurus
Body site Anatomical site where microbial samples were extracted from according to the Uber Anatomy Ontology
Endometrial cavity Cavity of body of uterus,Endometrial cavity,Endometrial lumen,Intrauterine cavity,endometrial cavity
Condition The experimental condition / phenotype studied according to the Experimental Factor Ontology
Clinical treatment Clinical treatment,clinical treatment
Group 0 name Corresponds to the control (unexposed) group for case-control studies
Control group (CT)
Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
Metritis group (MET_no treatment)
Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
Clinical group comparison of metritis or uterine health by other studies for Cows with metritis that had not received individual antimicrobial treatment in the last 14 days prior to sampling.
Group 0 sample size Number of subjects in the control (unexposed) group
32
Group 1 sample size Number of subjects in the case (exposed) group
25

Lab analysis

Sequencing type
WMS
16S variable region One or more hypervariable region(s) of the bacterial 16S gene
Not specified
Sequencing platform Manufacturer and experimental platform used for quantifying microbial abundance
Illumina

Statistical Analysis

Data transformation Data transformation applied to microbial abundance measurements prior to differential abundance testing (if any).
log transformation
Statistical test
ANCOM-BC
Significance threshold p-value or FDR threshold used for differential abundance testing (if any)
0.05
MHT correction Have statistical tests be corrected for multiple hypothesis testing (MHT)?
Yes


Signature 1

Needs review

Curated date: 2025/02/25

Curator: MyleeeA

Revision editor(s): MyleeeA

Source: Figure 6 and Supplementary Table 3

Description: ANCOM-BC heatmap of natural log fold changes of genera abundance for MET_no Treatment vs Control (CT) compared to genera from other studies.

Abundance in Group 1: increased abundance in Metritis group (MET_no treatment)

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Streptobacillus
Filifactor
Citrobacter
Chlamydia

Revision editor(s): MyleeeA

Signature 2

Needs review

Curated date: 2025/02/25

Curator: MyleeeA

Revision editor(s): MyleeeA

Source: Figure 6 and Supplementary Table 3

Description: ANCOM-BC heatmap of natural log fold changes of genera abundance for MET_no Treatment vs Control (CT) compared to genera from other studies.

Abundance in Group 1: decreased abundance in Metritis group (MET_no treatment)

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Streptomyces
Micrococcus
Corynebacterium
Brucella
Brevibacterium
Bifidobacterium

Revision editor(s): MyleeeA