Gut microbiome alterations precede graft rejection in kidney transplantation patients/Experiment 4

From BugSigDB


Needs review

Curated date: 2025/04/06

Curator: MyleeeA

Revision editor(s): MyleeeA

Subjects

Location of subjects
Germany
Host species Species from which microbiome was sampled. Contact us to have more species added.
Homo sapiens
Body site Anatomical site where microbial samples were extracted from according to the Uber Anatomy Ontology
Feces Cow dung,Cow pat,Droppings,Dung,Excrement,Excreta,Faeces,Fecal material,Fecal matter,Fewmet,Frass,Guano,Matières fécales@fr,Merde@fr,Ordure,Partie de la merde@fr,Piece of shit,Porción de mierda@es,Portion of dung,Portion of excrement,Portion of faeces,Portion of fecal material,Portion of fecal matter,Portion of feces,Portion of guano,Portion of scat,Portionem cacas,Scat,Spoor,Spraint,Stool,Teil der fäkalien@de,Feces,feces
Condition The experimental condition / phenotype studied according to the Experimental Factor Ontology
Transplant outcome measurement Transplant outcome measurement,transplant outcome measurement
Group 0 name Corresponds to the control (unexposed) group for case-control studies
Rejection (Sample 1-Pre rejection)
Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
Rejection (Sample 2-Post rejection)
Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
Participants in the Rejection group were those who showed rejection after kidney transplantation within a timeframe of 90 to 1000 days post rejection.
Group 0 sample size Number of subjects in the control (unexposed) group
32
Group 1 sample size Number of subjects in the case (exposed) group
21

Lab analysis

Sequencing type
16S
16S variable region One or more hypervariable region(s) of the bacterial 16S gene
V3-V4
Sequencing platform Manufacturer and experimental platform used for quantifying microbial abundance
Illumina

Statistical Analysis

Data transformation Data transformation applied to microbial abundance measurements prior to differential abundance testing (if any).
relative abundances
Statistical test
Mann-Whitney (Wilcoxon)
Significance threshold p-value or FDR threshold used for differential abundance testing (if any)
0.05
MHT correction Have statistical tests be corrected for multiple hypothesis testing (MHT)?
Yes
Matched on Factors on which subjects have been matched on in a case-control study
age, chronic kidney disease, time, sex, Matched on: "Donor type" is not in the list (abnormal glucose tolerance, acetaldehyde, acute graft vs. host disease, acute lymphoblastic leukemia, acute myeloid leukemia, adenoma, age, AIDS, alcohol consumption measurement, alcohol drinking, ...) of allowed values.Donor type

Alpha Diversity

Shannon Estimator of species richness and species evenness: more weight on species richness
unchanged
Simpson Estimator of species richness and species evenness: more weight on species evenness
unchanged
Richness Number of species
unchanged

Signature 1

Needs review

Curated date: 2025/04/07

Curator: MyleeeA

Revision editor(s): MyleeeA

Source: Figure 5d

Description: Differential abundance analysis of bacterial taxa between Rejection (Pre Rejection) and Rejection (Post Rejection).

Abundance in Group 1: increased abundance in Rejection (Sample 2-Post rejection)

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Blautia
Faecalibacterium

Revision editor(s): MyleeeA

Signature 2

Needs review

Curated date: 2025/04/08

Curator: MyleeeA

Revision editor(s): MyleeeA

Source: Figure 5d

Description: Differential abundance analysis of bacterial taxa between Rejection (Pre Rejection) and Rejection (Post Rejection).

Abundance in Group 1: decreased abundance in Rejection (Sample 2-Post rejection)

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Fusobacterium
Streptococcus

Revision editor(s): MyleeeA