Effect of gut microbiome modulation on muscle function and cognition: the PROMOTe randomised controlled trial/Experiment 4

From BugSigDB


Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Chloe on 2024-11-22

Curated date: 2024/10/11

Curator: Rukaya-lab

Revision editor(s): Rukaya-lab, MyleeeA

Subjects

Location of subjects
United Kingdom
Host species Species from which microbiome was sampled. Contact us to have more species added.
Homo sapiens
Body site Anatomical site where microbial samples were extracted from according to the Uber Anatomy Ontology
Feces Cow dung,Cow pat,Droppings,Dung,Excrement,Excreta,Faeces,Fecal material,Fecal matter,Fewmet,Frass,Guano,Matières fécales@fr,Merde@fr,Ordure,Partie de la merde@fr,Piece of shit,Porción de mierda@es,Portion of dung,Portion of excrement,Portion of faeces,Portion of fecal material,Portion of fecal matter,Portion of feces,Portion of guano,Portion of scat,Portionem cacas,Scat,Spoor,Spraint,Stool,Teil der fäkalien@de,Feces,feces
Condition The experimental condition / phenotype studied according to the Experimental Factor Ontology
Diet Dietary,Diets,Diet,diet
Group 0 name Corresponds to the control (unexposed) group for case-control studies
Baseline Prebiotic
Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
End of study Prebiotic
Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
Week 12 (End of study) participants who received daily prebiotic supplementation (inulin and fructo-oligosaccharides) along with branched-chain amino acids (BCAA) and resistance exercise.
Group 0 sample size Number of subjects in the control (unexposed) group
36
Group 1 sample size Number of subjects in the case (exposed) group
32
Antibiotics exclusion Number of days without antibiotics usage (if applicable) and other antibiotics-related criteria used to exclude participants (if any)
3 months.

Lab analysis

Sequencing type
WMS
16S variable region One or more hypervariable region(s) of the bacterial 16S gene
Not specified
Sequencing platform Manufacturer and experimental platform used for quantifying microbial abundance
Illumina

Statistical Analysis

Data transformation Data transformation applied to microbial abundance measurements prior to differential abundance testing (if any).
centered log-ratio
Statistical test
Linear Regression
Significance threshold p-value or FDR threshold used for differential abundance testing (if any)
0.05
MHT correction Have statistical tests be corrected for multiple hypothesis testing (MHT)?
Yes
Matched on Factors on which subjects have been matched on in a case-control study
Matched on: "twin pairs" is not in the list (abnormal glucose tolerance, acetaldehyde, acute graft vs. host disease, acute lymphoblastic leukemia, acute myeloid leukemia, adenoma, age, AIDS, alcohol consumption measurement, alcohol drinking, ...) of allowed values.twin pairs
Confounders controlled for Confounding factors that have been accounted for by stratification or model adjustment
age, sex, Confounders controlled for: "zygosity" is not in the list (abnormal glucose tolerance, acetaldehyde, acute graft vs. host disease, acute lymphoblastic leukemia, acute myeloid leukemia, adenoma, age, AIDS, alcohol consumption measurement, alcohol drinking, ...) of allowed values.zygosity, Confounders controlled for: "baseline microbiota" is not in the list (abnormal glucose tolerance, acetaldehyde, acute graft vs. host disease, acute lymphoblastic leukemia, acute myeloid leukemia, adenoma, age, AIDS, alcohol consumption measurement, alcohol drinking, ...) of allowed values.baseline microbiota

Alpha Diversity

Shannon Estimator of species richness and species evenness: more weight on species richness
increased
Richness Number of species
increased

Signature 1

Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Chloe on 2024-11-22

Curated date: 2024/10/11

Curator: Rukaya-lab

Revision editor(s): MyleeeA, Rahila, Chrisawoke, Rukaya-lab

Source: Supplementary Figure S6

Description: Significant Microbiota Features identified between Baseline Prebiotic and Study End Prebiotic using Linear models.

Abundance in Group 1: increased abundance in End of study Prebiotic

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Actinomyces graevenitzii
Actinomycetaceae
Actinomycetales
Actinomycetes
Actinomycetota
Anaerostipes hadrus
Bifidobacteriaceae
Bifidobacteriales
Bifidobacterium
Bifidobacterium dentium
Bifidobacterium longum
Candidatus Nanosynbacter
Candidatus Nanosynbacteraceae
Candidatus Nanosynbacterales
Candidatus Saccharibacteria
Candidatus Saccharimonadia
Parvimonas
Schaalia
Schaalia odontolytica
Streptococcus oralis
Anaerostipes
Intestinimonas sp. MSJ-38

Revision editor(s): MyleeeA, Rahila, Chrisawoke, Rukaya-lab

Signature 2

Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Chloe on 2024-11-22

Curated date: 2024/10/11

Curator: Rukaya-lab

Revision editor(s): MyleeeA, Rahila, Chrisawoke, Rukaya-lab

Source: Supplementary Figure S6

Description: Significant Microbiota Features identified between Baseline Prebiotic and Study End Prebiotic using Linear models.

Abundance in Group 1: decreased abundance in End of study Prebiotic

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Anaeromassilibacillus
Bigyra
Clostridia
Deltaproteobacteria
Eubacterium
Merdimmobilis
Merdimmobilis hominis
Methanobacteria
Negativicutes
Ruminococcus
Waltera
[Ruminococcus] torques
Lachnospiraceae bacterium NSJ 29Lachnospiraceae bacterium NSJ 29
Clostridium sp. AF34-10BH
Methanobacteriota
Eubacterium sp. AF17-7

Revision editor(s): MyleeeA, Rahila, Chrisawoke, Rukaya-lab